Whatever the PE2011 outcome, Singaporeans are already winners


 It’s 5 am on polling day. I slept past midnight and woke up before 5 am. The first thing I did was to look through my Facebook reading posts by Friends to gauge the voting sentiments for today. The mood is still quite the same. There is vocal support for both the Palm Tree and Heart camps and relatively muted on the other two. However, we all know that the silent majority decides at the ballot box.

This is strange. I am not involved in this PE. I am not taking part in this election, unlike in GE where I slept late and woke up early for obvious reasons. I am not counting nor polling agent for any candidate. My Party is not involved. Some of my active volunteers during GE are actively helping in two different camps. They actively try to solicit support from people they know. I wish them well.

PE is not supposed to be a political campaign. Constitutionally, the president is not another seat of executive power. There are limited powers. Yet there is unprecedented interest in this election. The ruling party obviously has a preferred choice with praise of the qualities of one candidate by none other than the Prime Minister himself. Three quarters of the trade unions and various associations (some whom I have not heard of before) and business federations have thrown their support behind that same candidate. I fail to see why their members would feel obligated to vote for their leaders’ choice. I suppose it is to signal who the government’s endorsed candidate is without the government having to officially endorse that candidate. 

So quite obviously, the ruling party is anxious to have its candidate selected. After all, there was a rather muted contest in the first PE in 1993 and a famine thereafter with two walkovers. It wasn’t that there were no interested parties in 1999 and 2005, but only 1 made it through the rather strict PEC vetting.

GE2011 was a watershed. There were contests in all but the Tanjong Pagar GRC, which itself was not contested due to a technical problem by the opposing team rather than a lack of interest. People were talking politics in the coffeeshop, in office and in cyberspace like never before. The quality of alternative candidates was much higher than before. The result was also unprecedented. History was made when a GRC finally fell to the alternative camp. Singapore went from a miserly two elected opposition members of parliament to a more respectable six. It is still a long way from a functioning democratic parliament but nevertheless a positive progress.

Now, four candidates have made it through the strict PEC requirements. It showed that there is now sufficient courage by capable people to step forward as alternates to what the ruling party desires. I applaud all who have stepped forward, even if I cannot agree with the platform that some have contested on. They are winners in my eyes for stepping forward. And who is my choice? I can only say that the two past presidents I most admire are Mr Wee Kim Wee for his genuine love for the people and Mr Ong Teng Cheong for his courage to stand up where it mattered seriously to him and to the country. I will go for someone whom I feel has the qualities of both.

I had long sought a decent contest for the PE and was dismayed at the weak challenge by Mr Chua Kim Yeow and the non-contest in the other two PEs.  I wrote to ST Forum in 1993 to urge Mr Chua to give a more spirited fight, which he eventually did on the 11th hour. I gave him my vote. Nevertheless, Mr Ong Teng Cheong won my heart later for his determined challenge for what he felt should be right for the office. I wrote again to ST Forum in 2005 to urge the PEC to be more flexible in their evaluation to allow a contest. That did not mean I would have supported the alternative candidates but I wanted to have my choice.

The calls for contest also did not mean I supported the idea of an election for the president. I see nothing wrong with the old system of selecting dignified people for a ceremonial post. The reason for an elected president is clear for all to see. It was initiated after a poor GE showing by the ruling party in 1991 to check a ‘rogue’ government that may be elected by the people. Since the post had been created, it was then best to have it contested to let the true choice of the people be represented. And if the result turned out to be undesirable for the ruling party, it may then feel compelled to review the scheme again. Hence, I am certain they are keenly watching this contest closely to see the outcome.

The selection and campaigning process itself has already done much to change our political landscape in a non-political election. The strict PEC requirements meant only an elite group of perhaps 300 people could qualify to contest, most of them with past links to the establishment. The fact that four had qualified is a big surprise to many. It shows a growing desire by capable people to challenge the establishment, whether in this PE or in the GE or in other matters of governance. The establishment has long lamented that we are politically apathetic and that it was difficult to get good people to step forward to hold public office. I think that will be no more. However, the ruling party will not have the monopoly of talent anymore. There will be more reasonable contests in future elections.

Voters are no longer passive like in past elections. In GE2011 and now in PE2011, more people are interested in the process. In the “cowboy towns” of the cyberworld (a term by PM Lee), people have dug deep to research about candidates and their past. Some on the “lunatic fringes” (a term by a new Minister) may perhaps have been too enthusiastic. It is an unstoppable process unless we kill the Internet and move ourselves back to the stone age of not-so-long-ago where only the mainstream media is what we had to live on.

I was surprised at the sheer number of people volunteering for the alternative parties in GE2011. It was more than I could personally cope with to get them organised given the short campaigning time. Some are highly qualified lawyers, doctors, bankers, professionals, business people and even civil servants (surprise, surprise). Some have continued in PE2011 to help the different candidates.

I am excited in this PE and watching the outcome because Singapore has reached a new political landscape. It is hard to imagine going back to the muted elections we had in the past. If we cannot move backwards, the only reasonable thing going forward is to define a new political playing field where we will progress together for the common good of Singapore. People want to hear alternative voices. For there to be alternative voices, there must be enough good people stepping forward to fill the roles. It is happening now.

Where there’s change, there may be some discomfort during the adjustment. We might as well learn to adjust now. The process has started and Singapore is the winner.

It is now 7 am. It’s almost time to get ready to cast my vote. Meanwhile, thanks again to all the four Tans for stepping forward. Whatever the outcome, let’s respect voters’ decision and move on to define the new political landscape together.

Advertisements

9 comments on “Whatever the PE2011 outcome, Singaporeans are already winners

  1. Well said. Very informative and balanced piece of writing. Full of logic and unbiased article. I enjoy reading it. Thks for the write. I wish you success in your new role. Cheers

  2. Thanks Alan.

    Nuffnang: I rather judge people by what they do than by what colours they may have worn in the past.

    The fight put by TCB has shown the armour can be cracked.

  3. Singapore will be finished from 1st September. All our money will being ‘eaten up’ by the new President. He has past experience to lost all money. Singaporeans never vote wisely this time. All Singaporeans will not be getting any ‘package’ for the next six years. Pissed off to have him as President…. Not qualify.

  4. Pingback: Singapore Elects New President · Global Voices

  5. Superbrand Cheesepie says:-

    PAP saw its margin of survival plummet from 20% in the recent GE (60% ayes less 40% nays = 20% margin) to a razor-thin 0.34% (being the lead DTT had over TCB). 65% of Singaporeans also voted against DTT.

    Had the PM done the following before PE2011:-
    (i) reduced ministerial pay by 65%
    (ii) reduced Presidential pay by 60%
    (iii) pledged to solve flooding by 2015
    (iv) relieve the congestion on MRT & buses
    (v) made a quantative pledge on imposing a quota on foreign influx
    (vi) produced HARD EVIDENCE PROOF of what DTT’s kids really did during NS to rebut all the malicious smears circulating on internet blogs and chatrooms
    (vii) promised all Singaporeans that they would be able to withdraw their CPF special a/c and medisave during their lifetimes and not after

    then DTT’s votes may rise to 90% and storm into Istana as a clear victor. As it is, DTT’s pathetic 0.34% margin of victory (if you could call it that!) is now a clear indictment of the collapsing moral authority of the PAPists. Less than one-third of a percentage point LESS, and DTT might have lost. 65% of Singaporeans have also repudiated DTT as their president.

    DTT – should be aware of this:- If Your Excellency walk into a hall of Singaporeans you can expect 65% of them not to stand up for you. You better avoid uncontrolled public gatherings for awhile. Stick to PAPists-controlled occasions with all seats and bleaches stuffed with die die diehard PAPist loyalists.

    If I were the PM, I would take this very very seriously and hold a huge PAPist corporate retreat to have a proper honest soul-searching to see why this is so. There are lost opportunities aplenty.

    • Thanks for the observations. I hope whatever our political ideologies, please respect the outcome as any public display of anger will not do Singapore good.

  6. Mr Yee Jenn Jong, I believe that when 2/3 of parliament has effectively the power to override the president’s veto power as laid out in the constitution, the president is mainly a ceremonial figurehead and hence can essentially be done with. (I am not sure how far or close this goes with the WP manifesto’s stand on the president, but believe that it was right that Mr Low Thia Khiang made sure that no one in the WP endorsed or spoke up for any of the candidates in the PE, the way that people in the other opposition parties all rushed to stand up for various candidates. The results of 65% who chose not to vote for TT showed that despite the emphasis on non-partisan politics that the government has mentioned applies to the PE, Singaporeans still vote largely based on partisan politics and affiliations and also, Singaporeans are now emerging with a greater sense of political awareness after decades of repression. Whatever this will translate into for the next GE or PE is another guess, but it is at least an encouraging sign that we are no longer the mainly apathetic crowd that people thought that we were.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s